ISO 45001 Certification in egypt

ISO 45001 Certification in egypt

Blog Article

ISO 45001 and OHSAS 18001 are both standards designed to help organizations manage occupational health and safety (OHS), but they differ in key areas related to structure, approach, and emphasis on leadership and continual improvement.

1. Standard Structure and Alignment

One of the most significant differences is that ISO 45001 Registration in egypt follows the high-level structure (HLS) adopted by other ISO management system standards, such as ISO 9001 (Quality Management) and ISO 14001 (Environmental Management). This structure makes it easier for organizations to integrate multiple management systems. HLS provides a common framework for leadership engagement, risk-based thinking, and a more systematic approach to continuous improvement.

In contrast, OHSAS 18001 had its own structure that wasn't as easily integrated with other management systems. ISO 45001’s alignment with HLS makes it more adaptable and applicable to a wide variety of organizations, enabling a more consistent approach to managing various risks.

2. Focus on Leadership and Worker Participation

ISO 45001 places a much stronger emphasis on leadership involvement than OHSAS 18001. The standard explicitly requires top management to demonstrate leadership and commitment to the OHS management system. This includes actively promoting a health and safety culture, ensuring the necessary resources are provided, and addressing risks and opportunities at the strategic level.

Another important aspect of ISO 45001 Certification cost in egypt is its greater emphasis on worker participation. The standard mandates that workers at all levels be involved in decision-making processes related to OHS. This includes consultation, feedback, and engagement in identifying hazards, assessing risks, and implementing preventive measures. OHSAS 18001 had some provisions for worker consultation but did not stress it to the same extent.

3. Risk-Based Thinking

ISO 45001 introduces a more systematic approach to risk management, requiring organizations to identify and assess both risks and opportunities that can affect the OHS performance. This risk-based thinking drives the development of proactive strategies for preventing injuries and illnesses rather than merely responding to them.

OHSAS 18001 also focused on hazard identification and risk assessment, but ISO 45001’s approach is broader, incorporating the idea of considering both risks and opportunities in the context of achieving continual improvement in occupational health and safety.

4. Context of the Organization

ISO 45001 Certification services in egypt introduces the concept of understanding the "context of the organization," which involves analyzing external and internal factors that may impact occupational health and safety. This includes understanding the needs and expectations of workers, contractors, and other interested parties, and how these factors could affect the OHS management system. OHSAS 18001 did not have a similar requirement, limiting organizations to focusing mainly on direct operational risks.

5. Continual Improvement and Performance Monitoring

ISO 45001 has a stronger focus on continual improvement and performance monitoring through the use of key performance indicators (KPIs), audits, and reviews. While OHSAS 18001 did require audits and corrective actions, ISO 45001 stresses the use of data-driven decision-making to improve the OHS management system over time.

Conclusion

In summary, ISO 45001 is a more comprehensive, modern standard compared to OHSAS 18001. It encourages better leadership, worker involvement, risk-based thinking, and continual improvement while aligning with other ISO management standards for greater integration. Organizations transitioning from OHSAS 18001 to ISO 45001 Certification Consultants in egypt  will find it requires a more strategic approach to managing occupational health and safety.

 

Report this page